"Nothing is more powerful than an idea whose time has come."
Alternate Website Access:
What YOU Can and Should Do to Assist in the Lawsuit
As part of the People's Rights Network, we are in a position to assist in the lawsuit against Ammon Bundy and People's Rights.
Share (Alt) Idaho 1N, Idaho 2, Idaho 4NE, Idaho 4NW, Idaho 4SE, Idaho 4SW, Idaho 5, Idaho 6, Idaho 7, Idaho 8, Idaho 9, Idaho 10, Idaho 11, Idaho 12, Idaho 13, Idaho 14, Idaho 15
As part of the People's Rights Network, we have sat back and allowed Ammon to be attacked just as if he were the People's Rights Network itself! As a matter of fact, he is not!
As part of the People's Rights Network, we are in the position of filing complaints to the Idaho Judicial Council against Judge Norton for violating our right to participate in the court proceedings. We are also in the position to file bar grievances with the Idaho State Bar against St. Luke’s attorneys for their violations. It is also crucial that we file an affidavit with the federal court, informing the judge that we are the People's Rights Network and not Ammon.
So, what do we seek to accomplish?
- File an Affidavit with the Federal Courts - Since People's Rights Network is one of the defendants on this lawsuit, and the people involved in the People's Rights Network reside nationwide, it would only make sense that this case proceed in the federal court rather than state court. Not only will the filing of an affidavit with the federal courts inform the court that Ammon DOES NOT represent the entire People’s Rights Network, but it will further prove federal jurisdiction, and help to convince the judge that this case should indeed be handled federally, rather than at the state level.
- File bar grievances – Simply put, if WE THE PEOPLE see that an attorney is violating the law or Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct, we have the right to file a grievance with the State Bar. Afterall, nobody is above the law - not even a lawyer. The State Bar opens an investigation into each bar complaint that they receive. If they determine that there is clear and convincing evidence of professional misconduct, they will issue a private reprimand, public reprimand, or disbarment, depending on the severity of the violation(s). Please click HERE to file a bar grievance.
- File complaints to the Idaho Judicial Council – If WE THE PEOPLE see that a judge has violated the law or Idaho Code of Judicial Conduct, we have the right to file a complaint with the Idaho Judicial Council. Rule 2.6 states “Ensuring the Right to Be Heard (A) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, or that person’s lawyer, the right to be heard according to law.* We are each part of People’s Rights Network, and as such we have the right to be heard according to the judge’s own rules! This is just one example of a rule that has been broken. I encourage you to read through at least some of the rules and educate yourself on what they are and how they could be applied in a complaint. Please click HERE to file a complaint with the Idaho Judicial Council.
They’ve buried Ammon and Diego with paperwork, if all 67,000+ of us file, maybe we can turn the tables!
Thank you so much for what you have done and continue to do to stand with your neighbors. This network could not continue without your willingness to further the cause for liberty.
**An affidavit template has been included in the update below for your convenience.
**A criminal complaint template has been included in the update below for your convenience.
We still need to file criminal complaints! Here are some helpful resources to get you started...
If you would like to file a criminal complaint against the judge or Holland & Hart, that process is ongoing and we the people can continue to file those as time goes on. We may also continue to file bar complaints and complaints to the Idaho Judicial Council as described in the original newsroom article.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING CRIMINAL COMPLAINT:
1. Print 1 copy for the judge and one for yourself (2 copies total), of the criminal complaint with the exhibit - the Garth Cease and Desist Order. Don't sign it yet.2. Take the full files to a notary, sign and date each copy (but NOT the original - save that), as directed by the notary.4. Pay the notary and save the original to make more copies as needed. Save one notarized copy for your own records.
5. Send Judge McDevitt 1 original and 1 copy. When sending by mail, make a self-addressed stamped envelope, send one original and one copy via certified mail, with a note, asking the clerk - “Please file stamp my copy and return it in the enclosed envelope. Thank you.” Certified mail gives you a record that your mail was delivered.
(FYI - Certified Mail is a USPS service that provides proof of mailing via a receipt to the sender. With electronic USPS tracking, the sender is notified when the mailing was delivered or that a delivery attempt was made. Additional options, like Return Receipt, provide evidence of delivery in the form of a postcard signed by the recipient or an email with an electronic copy of the recipient's signature. A certified item needs a delivery signature and is only available on first class mail.)
The complaint and the unlawful cease and desist order are attached.
MAIL COMPLAINTS TO:
Judge Annie McDevitt
Ada County Courthouse
Chambers Room 4148
200 W. Front Street
Rules Violated:
Judge - Rule 55
Attorney - please see template.
Thank you for all you continue to do to help your neighbors.
Affidavit Template
Attached you will find a template that can be used for your affidavit.
Please note:
- Affidavits should be mailed THIS week through Friday May 19th at the latest) to:
- Holland & Hart, LLP 800 West Main St. Suite 1750, Boise, ID 83702
- Judge Lynn Norton, 4th District Court
200 West Front St, Boise, ID 83702 - Please also send the original and a copy to :
U.S. District Courts, District of Idaho, 550 W. Fort Street Suite 400 Boise, Idaho 83724
Note — When sending to the U.S. District Courts, please include a pre addressed return envelope and ask them to timestamp your original and send it back to you in the pre-addressed envelope. - Federal courts do not allow online filing and the judge should be ruling on this case this week, so we need these affidavits in ASAP! If you live near, you can hand deliver.
- Affidavits MUST BE notarized!
- Please insert your name or info where it says (your name) or (your address), etc. in the template.
- Please remove any line item you do not have personal knowledge of and add any line items not listed that you do have personal knowledge of -- Affidavits must be firsthand knowledge of facts only.
- must fill out the certificate of delivery
- Must send a copy to Holland and Hart as well
Copy/Paste or Download the following as a TEMPLATE into a google, word, or any other kind of doc, and EDIT IT to your personal experience as a person on this communication network, get it notarized and file it to the case!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Ammon Bundy Case No. 1:23-CV-212-DCN
Plaintiff,
vs
St. Luke’s Health System LTD, St. Luke’s Regional Medical Center LTD, Chris
Roth, Natasha Erickson, MD, Tracy Jungman
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT
(SWORN STATEMENT)
Date: ____________________, 20____
My legal name is (your name) (“Affiant”) and acknowledge I am:
a.) Age: (your age)
b.) Address: (your address)
c.) Residency: (your state)
Being duly sworn, hereby swear under oath that:
1. Defendants, filed as Plaintiffs in the Ada County Court, have filed suit or complaint against the People's Rights Network.
2. The People's Rights Network (PRN) is not a citizen of any state, it is not a living man, not a living woman, it is not a person, nor a corporation, church, non-profit organization, political organization, or any other legal entity.
3. People residing in many states make up the PRN and use the network to communicate with one another.
4. Ammon Bundy is not the People’s Right Network and the People’s Rights Network is not Ammon Bundy.
5. PRN is simply a communications network of nearly 68,000 people all over the United States and Canada.
6. St. Luke’s CEO, Chris Roth, complained that PRN defamed him by posting a picture of him with the words “Child Trafficker." This was published by someone from the state of Utah.
7. This post has been used against Ammon Bundy since the beginning of the State lawsuit.
8. Ammon Bundy, in Idaho, did not post the article in Utah.
9. NO ONE in PRN has authority over what anyone else in the network publishes or does not publish outside of the network.
10. Each Area in PRN functions completely autonomously from each other and any content published to an area is authorized by Area Assistants with State Assistants in the respective state.
11. Each area and state are independent and autonomous from other areas and states.
12. Ammon Bundy is an influential person throughout PRN, but he has no control over what any one in PRN puts into print or any actions they take.
13. Ammon does not have control over posting or content published in areas other than in Idaho.
14. Defendants, as the Plaintiffs in the State case, have repeatedly tried to hold Mr. Bundy accountable for the free speech of people residing in the state of Utah and elsewhere.
15. Defendants appear to be suing all 67,302 people residing in 41 states and 3 Canadian provinces, making this controversy jurisdiction of the United States Court according to 28 U.S.C. Section 1441 (b)(2) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1332, as this case involves controversies between citizens of different states,
where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
16. The Ada County Idaho Court presiding Judge Lynn Norton, has allowed the Defendants to pursue the lawsuit against People's Rights Network as if it is Ammon Bundy, intentionally avoiding the obvious questions of what PRN legally is and does the state court have jurisdiction.
17. When twenty+ people of the PRN, which was listed as a Defendant in the case, attended the court hearing on February 21, 2023 Judge Norton would not allow them to speak.
18. Several people tried to speak in court that day and Judge Norton ordered them to not speak, and even threatened them with arrest. This is in direct violation of Idaho Rules of Judicial Conduct Rule 2.6 Ensuring the right to be heard.
19. Judge Norton even put on record that PRN did not appear at the hearing.
20. The question of jurisdiction of a network of people residing in many states appears to be a federal question. Defendants have complained about the actions of people residing in a state other than Idaho and have incorrectly filed with the state court.
21. As a part of People's Rights Network, I , (your name) respectfully request that this case be heard in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho.
Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare and affirm that the above-mentioned statement is, to the best of my knowledge, true and correct.
Affiant’s Signature: __________________________ Date: _______________
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which the certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
State of ____________________
County of ____________________
On ____________________, 20____, before me, __________________________, personally appeared _________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed the same in their authorized capacity, and that by their signature on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of ____________________ that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary Signature: __________________________
(Seal)
Certificate Of Delivery
I hereby certify that on this day of _______________, 202____, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was sent to:
Holland & Hart c/o Erik Stidham Attorneys for Defendants 800 W. Main Street, Suite 1750 Boise, ID 83702
US District Court of the Dist of Idaho 550 W Fort St Ste 400 Boise ID 83724 | x U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid Hand Delivered By E-filing Email:
x U.S. Mail, Postage Prepaid Hand Delivered By E-filing Email:
| ||
|
|
| |
__________________________
SIGNATURE /s/
___________________________
PRINTED NAME